WTO Dispute Settlement: General Appreciation and the Role of India
ICFAI University Press, WTO and Dispute Resolution, Hyderabad (India), K. Padmaja, ed., pp. 147-201, 2007
61 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2007
Abstract
On 1 January 1995, the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) entered into force. Until August 2006, the DSU has since been applied to 348 complaints - more cases than dispute settlement under the GATT 1947 had dealt with in nearly five decades. The system is perceived, both by practitioners and in academic literature, to work generally well. However, it has also revealed some flaws. Negotiations to review and reform the DSU have been taking place since 1997 (DSU review), however, without yielding any result so far. In the meantime, WTO Members and adjudicating bodies managed to develop the system further through evolving practice. While this approach may remedy some practical shortcomings of the DSU text, the more profound imbalance between relatively efficient judicial decision-making in the WTO (as incorporated in the DSU) and nearly blocked political decision-making evolves into a serious challenge to the sustainability of the system.
This article provides an overview of the first eleven years of DSU practice and the current DSU review negotiations. An outlook for future challenges to the system is also given. Moreover, specific chapters of the text focus on the role of India in WTO dispute settlement, her use of the system and her participation in the DSU review negotiations.
Keywords: International Trade, Trade Policy, WTO, Dispute Settlement, Dispute Settlement Understanding, DSU Review Negotiations, India
JEL Classification: F02, F13, K33, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties and Free Riders
By Chad P. Bown
-
The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape
-
GATT, Dispute Settlement and Cooperation
By Marie C. Thursby and Dan Kovenock
-
The Case for Auctioning Countermeasures in the WTO
By Kyle Bagwell, Petros C. Mavroidis, ...
-
The Case for Tradable Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement
By Kyle Bagwell, Petros C. Mavroidis, ...
-
Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in WTO Disputes
By Andrew T. Guzman and Beth A. Simmons
-
Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement
By Kym Anderson