Benefits of Comparative Tort Reasoning: Lost in Translation

Journal of Tort Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2007

47 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2007 Last revised: 7 Jan 2010

Abstract

In this article I argue that the noble cause of comparative law as an intellectual activity is undermined by those who focus on its forensic utility. Specifically, I examine the practical value to practitioners and judges in the court of final appeal in an English-speaking jurisdiction of paying attention to how tort issues are analysed in a different jurisdiction when the subject matter of the domestic case at hand does not positively require it. Part I argues: that the benefits of resorting to "comparative tort reasoning" vary greatly according to the focus of the legal analysis in issue: outcomes; arguments; principle; or conceptual arrangement; and that by far the potential for enrichment is greatest in the context of comparative tort argumentation. Part II addresses the study of law across, not just jurisdictional but language barriers: "comparative foreign-language law." My argument here is that the practitioner and judge in an English-speaking jurisdiction should exercise extreme caution in using comparative materials from foreign language systems. Part III considers "coordinated" tort materials: materials that seek to expound tort law across multiple intra-national tort jurisdictions, such as restatements of law by the American Law Institute, or across multiple national tort jurisdictions such as Helmut Koziol's "Principles of European Tort Law" published in 2005.

Keywords: Comparative law, torts, legal reasoning

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Stapleton, Jane, Benefits of Comparative Tort Reasoning: Lost in Translation. Journal of Tort Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1015370

Jane Stapleton (Contact Author)

Christ's College ( email )

St Andrew's Street
Cambridge, CB2 3BU
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
278
Abstract Views
1,383
Rank
200,141
PlumX Metrics