Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards
Organization, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 667-684, 2007
18 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2007
Abstract
In the field of global rule-setting for responsible business behaviour, multi-stakeholder standards have emerged in recent years because of their potential for effective consensus-building, knowledge-sharing and interest representation. Proponents also hold that multi-stakeholder standards could address problems related to other forms of global rule-setting for business. Despite alleged advantages, however, analyses of multi-stakeholder initiatives, considering benefits and drawbacks, have been lacking. This article examines multi-stakeholder standards compared to other collaborative standards adopted in the past decade, and focuses subsequently on the peculiarities of multi-stakeholder standards regarding participation, governance and implementation. Multi-stakeholder standards, which involve business and NGOs, and sometimes also governments, are more specific and well-elaborated than other types of standards. But monitoring and implementation are rarely used as means for increasing participation from multiple stakeholders, including most notably those from developing countries. The paper also discusses the implications of the current lack of specificity of the (multi-)stakeholder concept and suggests refinement of multi-stakeholder standards in terms of narrow versus broad inclusiveness.
Keywords: business, code of conduct, corporate responsibility, corporate social responsibility, global governance, international organizations, NGOs, stakeholders
JEL Classification: D21, F23, H7, G38, L1, L2, M1, M14, O19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Stakeholder Mismanagement and Corporate Social Responsibility Crises
By Ans Kolk and Jonatan Pinkse
-
Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility
By Ans Kolk
-
The Strategic Formation of Project Networks: A Relational Practice Perspective