Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values?

Posted: 9 Nov 2007 Last revised: 9 Nov 2012

See all articles by Stephen B. Billings

Stephen B. Billings

University of Colorado - Boulder

Thomas G. Thibodeau

University of Colorado at Boulder - Leeds School of Business

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 21, 2008

Abstract

This paper examines the influence that intrametropolitan government decentralization has on residential property values. A new methodological approach allows for an empirical test of whether the benefits of decentralizing local public good providers increases, decreases or leaves residential property appreciation rates unchanged. Past research in this area has been limited by the lack of variation in government structure within a region and by the self-selection of areas that decentralize governments. This research overcomes these limitations by 1) comparing appreciation rates for single-family homes that were located in areas that added local governments to appreciation rates for properties that were not; and 2) employing an estimation technique that border matches repeat sales to control for the self-selection of government structure. Overall, empirical results indicate that institutional decentralization has no influence on single-family property appreciation rates. It makes no difference whether the new government is the 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th new jurisdiction -- the new government does not influence appreciation rates. Residential property values for homes located in jurisdictions that added police special districts experienced rates of appreciation that were lower than comparable properties. Recreation, fire, water, sewer and other special districts had no measurable influence on appreciation rates. Empirical results also indicate that more overlap among local governments reduces appreciation rates. New governments created in areas whose residents have greater income heterogeneity increase appreciation rates. The distance separating the new government from existing governments, the land area of the new government and the creation of multiple new governments have no influence on appreciation rates. Finally, these results critically depend on the border matching repeat sales estimation technique employed here.

Suggested Citation

Billings, Stephen B. and Thibodeau, Thomas G., Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values? (August 21, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1028642 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028642

Stephen B. Billings (Contact Author)

University of Colorado - Boulder ( email )

Leeds School of Business
Koelbel Building
Boulder, CO US 80309
United States

Thomas G. Thibodeau

University of Colorado at Boulder - Leeds School of Business ( email )

Boulder, CO 80309-0419
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
776
PlumX Metrics