Should Products Liability Be Based on Past or Present Scientific Knowledge?

Posted: 23 Jun 1997

See all articles by Omri Ben-Shahar

Omri Ben-Shahar

University of Chicago Law School

Date Written: May 1997

Abstract

In designing and marketing new products, manufacturers face uncertainty regarding the harmful character of their products. If harm occurs due to a defective design, liability is imposed on manufacturers whenever the design of the product is determined to be unreasonably dangerous. In assessing the reasonableness of a design, courts often -- although the doctrine is not settled -- admit information which was acquired throughout the actual usage of the product -- information that often was not scientifically available at the time of production. The Asbestos litigation is a prominent example of this practice. This paper examines the incentive effects of such hindsight. It demonstrates that the utilization of information that is available ex post but was not available ex ante may lead to adverse incentive effects, (1) in installing safety devices in products, (2) in developing technologies that are less risky, and (3) in investing in research that can identify the risks in advance; yet it unambiguously improves incentives to make safety adjustments subsequent to the distribution of the product. While the overall welfare effect of hindsight in assessing liability is ambiguous, the paper demonstrates that it may reduce the utility of consumers and manufacturers alike.

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Ben-Shahar, Omri, Should Products Liability Be Based on Past or Present Scientific Knowledge? (May 1997). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=10481

Omri Ben-Shahar (Contact Author)

University of Chicago Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
767
PlumX Metrics