Listen: I Am Angry! An Experiment Comparing Ways of Revealing Emotions
29 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2007
Date Written: December 4, 2007
Abstract
We report on an experiment designed to explore whether allowing individuals to voice their anger prevents costly punishment. For this sake, we use an ultimatum minigame and distinguish two treatments: one in which responders can only accept or reject the offer, and the other in which they can also scold the proposer. By an unannounced successive two-person public goods game, with either the same partner or a different one, we additionally explore how "having a voice" affects later behavior. The evidence supports the conclusion that voicing one's outrage crowds out the need to harm oneself and the other. Yet, this emotional reaction does not lead to increased future cooperation.
Keywords: Ultimatum bargaining, Public goods game, Outrage, Punishment
JEL Classification: C72, C78, C92, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Tractable Model of Reciprocity and Fairness
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment
By F. A. A. M. Van Winden, Frans Van Dijk, ...
-
Individual Preferences for Giving
By Raymond J. Fisman, Shachar Kariv, ...
-
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
Moral Property Rights in Bargaining
By Simon Gächter and Arno Riedl
-
Direct Tests of Models of Social Preferences and a New Model
By James C. Cox and Vjollca Sadiraj
-
Implications of Trust, Fear, and Reciprocity for Modeling Economic Behavior
By James C. Cox, Klarita Sadiraj, ...
-
What Happens within Firms? A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Compensation Policies