Was Japanese Colonialism Good for the Welfare of Taiwanese? Stature and the Standard of Living

The China Quarterly, Vol. 192, pp. 990-1013, 2007

Posted: 14 Jan 2008

See all articles by Stephen L. Morgan

Stephen L. Morgan

University of Nottingham - Nottingham University Business School; University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Faculty of Social Sciences

Shiyung Liu

Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Abstract

Japanese rule transformed Taiwan from 1895 to 1945, laying the foundations for the post-1950 "economic miracle," but there is little consensus about the impact on the welfare of Taiwan's ethnic Chinese. A difficulty with past studies is the adequacy of economic indicators to measure the standard of living. Instead of conventional economic data, we use average adult height, an indicator of nutritional status. The rise in the average height of the Chinese indicates welfare improved under colonialism, but the static average height from 1930 highlights the negative effect of the shift in economic policy during the late colonial period.

Keywords: China, Taiwan, Japan, Colonialism, Standard of Living, Height, Anthropometric History

JEL Classification: N15, N35, O15, O53

Suggested Citation

Morgan, Stephen Lloyd and Liu, Shiyung, Was Japanese Colonialism Good for the Welfare of Taiwanese? Stature and the Standard of Living. The China Quarterly, Vol. 192, pp. 990-1013, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1083065

Stephen Lloyd Morgan (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham - Nottingham University Business School ( email )

Business School South
University of Nottingham
Nottingham, NG8 1BB
United Kingdom
+44 115 82 32116 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/Chinese/people/s.morgan

University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Faculty of Social Sciences ( email )

199 Taikang East Road
Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100
China
+86 186-6780-2355 (Phone)

Shiyung Liu

Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica ( email )

128 Academia Road, Section 2
Nankang
Taipei, 11529
Taiwan

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,001
PlumX Metrics