No Boy Left Behind? Single-Sex Education and the Essentialist Myth of Masculinity
74 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2008 Last revised: 13 Aug 2009
Date Written: February 12, 2008
Abstract
In late 2006, the Department of Education changed the Title IX regulations to broaden the permissibility of single-sex education in primary and secondary schools. The changes took place in the context of a growing concern over the performance and well-being of boys in American schools. This article describes, dissects, and critically analyzes the narrative about boys, masculinity, and single-sex education that surrounded these changes.
The public narrative about the need for single-sex education focused, in substantial part, on what I call the essentialist myth of masculinity. This article catalogs the important components of this myth: heteronormativity, aggression, activity, sports-obsession, competitiveness, stoicism, and not being girls. The article then shows, using education and gender theory, that this conception of masculinity is harmful to both girls and boys. Instead of pushing this form of masculinity, the law and schools should make room for multiple and varied masculinities for boys (and girls).
The article argues that the Title IX regulatory change that allows for the expansion of single-sex schooling can actually work to further empower and entrench the essentialist myth of masculinity, thus violating its own prohibition on sex stereotyping. By adopting strong interpretations of already-existing jurisprudence about gender stereotyping from both constitutional law and Title IX, the article shows how de-essentializing masculinity is possible and preferable in the law. The article concludes that schools that implement single-sex education must do so for reasons other than promoting an essentialized notion of masculinity and that the law must be vigilant in ensuring that schools' implementation not further reify dominant conceptions of what it means to be a boy.
Keywords: single-sex education, Title IX, masculinity, gender, essentialism, sex discrimination, Equal Protection
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
0 References
0 Citations
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
- Usage
- Abstract Views: 10362
- Downloads: 985
- Captures
- Readers: 8
- Usage
- Abstract Views: 10362
- Downloads: 985
- Captures
- Readers: 8
Recommended Papers
-
Reform or Retrenchment? Single Sex Education and the Construction of Race and Gender
-
By Nancy Levit
-
Separating Equals: Educational Research and the Long Term Consequences of Sex Segregation
By Nancy Levit
-
Theorizing the Connections Among Systems of Subordination
By Nancy Levit
-
By Wendy Parker
-
'Who's the Man?': Masculinities Studies, Terry Stops, and Police Training
-
Feminism for Men: Legal Ideology and the Construction of Maleness
By Nancy Levit
-
Our First Unisex President?: Black Masculinity and Obama's Feminine Side
-
Ricci v. DeStefano: A Masculinities Theory Analysis
By Ann Mcginley