Catastrophic Risks and First-Party Insurance
53 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2008 Last revised: 5 Nov 2009
Date Written: September 1, 2007
Abstract
Although the insurance industry demonstrates a growing concern about the severe rise in losses from natural disasters, only about one third of all potential victims have in fact purchased first-party catastrophe insurance. Although first-party insurance has several advantages, we find that there is indeed actually no demand for and supply of first-party insurance for natural catastrophes. Therefore, the central question we examine from a behavioral law and economics perspective is why in fact so little use is made of the possibilities of first-party insurance and why first-party insurance can constitute a viable alternative to government compensation. Further, we wonder whether compulsory first-party disaster coverage could be a solution. To conclude, we consider under which circumstances the further introduction of first-party catastrophe insurance should be applauded as a means to encourage potential victims to take control over their compensatory means without losing track of giving them preventive incentives as well.
Keywords: Natural catastrophes, first-party insurance, compulsory insurance, government relief
JEL Classification: K32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Do Not Attack the Watchdog! Banking Supervisor's Liability After Peter Paul
By Michel Tison
-
Bailouts in a Common Market: A Strategic Approach
By Ela Glowicka
-
Effectiveness of Bailouts in the EU
By Ela Glowicka
-
Recent Bank Bailouts - Lessons to Learn When Patience is a Virtue