Processes in the Interpretation of Generics and Cp-Laws
26 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2008
Date Written: February 4, 2008
Abstract
Ceteris Paribus (cp-)laws may be said to hold only 'other things equal', signaling that their truth is compatible with a range of exceptions. Several theorists have taken this feature to introduce the presumption that cp-laws are trivial, one that needs to be countered if we are to appeal to cp-laws in the course of scientific investigation or our philosophical theorizing about it. I argue that the triviality worry is misplaced by pointing out that cp-laws are just a subset of uncontroversially meaningful and contingent expressions of natural language, the generics. I then present an account of these generics that elucidates some of their most puzzling features, especially the ones that suggested the triviality worry in the first place.
Keywords: cp-laws, generics, semantics, natural language
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation