Hate Speech

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-09

EXTREME SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY, I. Hare, J. Weinstein, eds., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming

24 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2008

See all articles by Edwin Baker

Edwin Baker

University of Pennsylvania Law School (Deceased)

Abstract

This paper describes the rationale that a full protection theory of free speech, a theory based on respect for individual autonomy, would give for protecting hate speech. The paper then notes that such a rationale will be unpersuasive to many (including this author) if the harms associated with a failure to outlaw hate speech are as great as often suggested - most dramatically, if the failure to prohibit makes a substantial contribution to the occurrence of serious racial/ethnic violence or genocide. The article then attempts to outline what empirical evidence would be needed to support this conclusion and gives reasons to doubt that this evidence has been or will be forthcoming. Still, given the horrendous nature of the harm, caution suggests not taking the risk. That is, the risk may justify prohibiting hate speech given its possible r ole in causing these consequences. In response to this last point, however, the paper gives reasons to believe that the attempt to prohibit hate speech is more likely to exacerbate the risk of unacceptable outcomes than to generate the benign opposite. Thus, the argument ends in accepting the theoretical reasons for giving First Amendment protection to hate speech.

Keywords: hate speech, genocide, free speech, First Amendment

Suggested Citation

Baker, C. Edwin, Hate Speech. U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-09, EXTREME SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY, I. Hare, J. Weinstein, eds., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105043

C. Edwin Baker (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School (Deceased)

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,504
Abstract Views
4,307
Rank
23,292
PlumX Metrics