Bizarre Love Triangle: The Spending Clause, Section 1983, and Medicaid Entitlements

57 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2008 Last revised: 29 Nov 2011

See all articles by Nicole Huberfeld

Nicole Huberfeld

Boston University School of Law; Boston University - School of Public Health

Abstract

The first two terms of the Roberts Court signal a willingness to revisit precedent, and the Court appears poised to reinterpret another area of jurisprudence: the private enforcement of conditions on federal spending against states through actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The most recent pre-Roberts Court precedent is Gonzaga University v. Doe. Federal courts have inconsistently and confusingly applied the Gonzaga framework, but the Rehnquist Court would not revisit the rule. Last term, the Roberts Court granted a petition for certiorari that would have required reconsidering Gonzaga. Before it could be heard on the merits, the respondents mooted the case, but petitions for certiorari regularly arise in similar Medicaid enforcement cases. Thus, Gonzaga is likely to be revisited in the context of enforcement of Medicaid statutory entitlements. Medicaid does not contain an enforcement mechanism, but the Supreme Court facilitated enforcement of federal statutory rights against state officers through section 1983. However, this paper highlights recent events that increase the fragility of Medicaid.

The first part of this paper explores the structure of Medicaid and key provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 that change Medicaid from a program of promised care and benefits into one of no enforceable promises. The second part of this paper discusses Supreme Court decisions that reveal hostility to enforcement of conditions on spending legislation by beneficiaries under section 1983. This part also explores how changes in the Court's composition may allow this view to become the prevailing rule. Additionally, this section demonstrates the narrowing ability of individuals to enforce Medicaid entitlements through section 1983 due to two distinct but related splits in the circuit courts. The final part of this paper analyzes the Court's hostility to enforcing conditions on spending by section 1983 and proposes legislative responses to the impending demise of the Medicaid entitlement.

Keywords: Spending Clause, Section 1983, Medicaid

JEL Classification: I18, I38, K3

Suggested Citation

Huberfeld, Nicole, Bizarre Love Triangle: The Spending Clause, Section 1983, and Medicaid Entitlements. UC Davis Law Review, Winter 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105543

Nicole Huberfeld (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Boston University - School of Public Health ( email )

715 Albany Street
Boston, MA 02118
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
2,099
Rank
340,106
PlumX Metrics