Remedies for Export Subsidies in the Context of Article 4 of the SCM Agreement: Rethinking Some Persistent Issues

Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-50, March 2008

30 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2008

See all articles by Tsai-yu Lin

Tsai-yu Lin

National Taiwan University, College of Law, Taiwan

Abstract

The per se prohibited nature of export subsidies has justified faster and special dispute settlement procedures found in Article 4 of the SCM Agreement. The persistent problems of export subsidies remedies posed by WTO jurisprudence deserve continuous attention. From the perspective of efficacy, this paper does not view that the modification of subsidy should be included as an alternative remedy. For the purpose of exploring the remedy for one-time grant paid, adding the 'reimbursement clause' to contractual arrangements providing the subsidy or requiring the partial repayment of 'ongoing benefit' of the one-off subsidy merits further discussions. As well, the introduction of punitive countermeasures may induce more compliance. Additionally, this paper suggests that more submissions on clarification or the points of resolution should be advanced by Members under the Doha Round before a reform is likely to be truly realized in the future.

Keywords: export subsidy, SCM Agreement, remedy, repayment, punitive countermeasure, Doha Round

Suggested Citation

Lin, Tsai-yu, Remedies for Export Subsidies in the Context of Article 4 of the SCM Agreement: Rethinking Some Persistent Issues. Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-50, March 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1140593

Tsai-yu Lin (Contact Author)

National Taiwan University, College of Law, Taiwan ( email )

Taiwan

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
278
Abstract Views
1,724
Rank
201,645
PlumX Metrics