Lessons to Be Learned: How the Policy of Freedom to Contract in Delaware's Alternative Entity Law Might Inform Delaware's General Corporation Law

23 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2008

See all articles by Ann E. Conaway

Ann E. Conaway

Widener University Delaware Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 26, 2008

Abstract

This article considers whether, as a result of the recent activity by alternative entities in the public markets, it is appropriate to revise Delaware's General Corporation Law (DGCL) to provide greater contractual flexibility to shareholders in all Delaware corporations to alter or re-define the duties of directors and officers. Two situations presently call for contractual modification of managerial duties in public corporations: (1) aiding and abetting liability of advisors to exculpated directors; and (2) non-stockholder constituencies of B (or "Beneficial") Corporations or other purpose-driven entity.

Keywords: freedom of contract, modification or elimination of corporate fiduciary duties; B Corporation; aiding and abetting liability; protection for advisors to corporate managers; stakeholders v. stockholders; contractarian theory for 2008; flexibility for "green" or environmental companies; L3C;

Suggested Citation

Conaway, Ann E., Lessons to Be Learned: How the Policy of Freedom to Contract in Delaware's Alternative Entity Law Might Inform Delaware's General Corporation Law (June 26, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1152037 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152037

Ann E. Conaway (Contact Author)

Widener University Delaware Law School ( email )

4601 Concord Pike
Wilmington, DE 19803-0406
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
149
Abstract Views
1,194
Rank
201,040
PlumX Metrics