Fiduciary Duties and Equitably Compensation
Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 27, 1996
7 Pages Posted: 4 Jul 2008
Date Written: January 1, 1996
Abstract
Hodgkinson v. Simms, decided in 1994 by the Supreme Court of Canada, is one of a series of cases that has expanded the concept of equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty. One of the interesting questions about the case is whether there is, in truth, a sharp difference between compensation for loss caused by breach of fiduciary duty, and compensation for loss caused by other legal wrongs.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Waddams, Stephen Michael, Fiduciary Duties and Equitably Compensation (January 1, 1996). Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 27, 1996, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1154586
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.