The Racial Double Helix: Watson, Crick, and Brown v. Board of Education (Our No-Bell Prize Award Speech)

26 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2008

See all articles by Richard Delgado

Richard Delgado

Seattle University School of Law

Jean Stefancic

Seattle University School of Law

Date Written: August 1, 2008

Abstract

In support of our bid for an alternative major prize for Derrick Bell and to honor his career and scholarship, this Essay summarizes some of his contributions to the understanding of racial replication, together with those of a few of his friends, including ourselves. A midget, you see, standing on top of the shoulders of a giant, can occasionally see even farther than the giant. Part I explains how culture replicates itself. Part II considers a set of homeo-mechanisms having to do with interest-convergence (one of Bell's signature themes) or the structure of legal thought, both of the conservative and the liberal variety. Part III explores differential racialization, including the part played by breakthrough legal decisions like Brown.

Keywords: civil rights, Derrick Bell, James Watson, Francis Crick, Brown v. Board of Education, legal formalism, affirmative action, critical race theory, legal storytelling, social relations

Suggested Citation

Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean, The Racial Double Helix: Watson, Crick, and Brown v. Board of Education (Our No-Bell Prize Award Speech) (August 1, 2008). Howard Law Journal, Vol. 47, p. 476-498, 2004, U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1195562

Richard Delgado (Contact Author)

Seattle University School of Law ( email )

WA
United States

Jean Stefancic

Seattle University School of Law ( email )

901 12th Avenue, Sullivan Hall
P.O. Box 222000
Seattle, WA n/a 98122-1090
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
1,084
Rank
476,655
PlumX Metrics