Not-so-Classical Measurement Errors: A Validation Study of Homescan
31 Pages Posted: 27 Oct 2008 Last revised: 12 Dec 2022
Date Written: October 2008
Abstract
We report results from a validation study of Nielsen Homescan data. We use data from a large grocery chain to match thousands of individual transactions that were recorded by both the retailer (at the store) and the Nielsen Homescan panelist (at home). First, we report how often shopping trips are not reported, and how often trip information, product information, price, and quantity are reported with error. We focus on recording errors in prices, which are more prevalent, and show that they can be classified to two categories, one due to standard recording errors, while the other due to the way Nielsen constructs the price data. We then show how the validation data can be used to correct the impact of recording errors on estimates obtained from Nielsen Homescan data. We use a simple application to illustrate the impact of recording errors as well as the ability to correct for these errors. The application suggests that while recording errors are clearly present, and potentially impact results, corrections, like the one we employ, can be adopted by users of Homescan data to investigate the robustness of their results.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
CPI Bias from Supercenters: Does the BLS Know that Wal-Mart Exists?
By Jerry A. Hausman and Ephraim Leibtag
-
Consumer Benefits from Increased Competition in Shopping Outlets: Measuring the Effect of Wal-Mart
By Jerry A. Hausman and Ephraim Leibtag