Discourse and Discharge: Linguistic Analysis and Abuse of the 'Exemption by Declaration' Process in Bankruptcy

American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 70, p. 55, 1996

39 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2008

See all articles by Kenneth Decourcy Ferguson

Kenneth Decourcy Ferguson

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

Abstract

In Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, the United States Supreme Court interpreted section 522(1) of the Bankruptcy Code according to its "plain meaning" and permitted a debtor to exempt $110,000 that was ineligible for exemption under substantive exemption law. The decision of the Court was premised on the fact that there was no timely objection to the claim of exemption. Although conceding that its decision might tempt debtors to claim exemptions in property ineligible for exemption on the chance that the trustee and creditors would fail to object in time, the Court cataloged a number of other remedies, including denial of discharge for false claims or false statements and criminal prosecution for perjury, that it suggested would be applicable to deter bad faith claims of exemption.

This Article undertakes a law and linguistics analysis of the false claim, false statement, and perjury issues in the context of bad faith claims of exemption. Following a description of the process for exempting property in Chapter 7 cases and a description of basic rules regarding residual remedies that the Supreme Court suggested remain viable for false statements made in the exemption process despite 522(1), conversational implicature analysis drawn from linguistics is applied to develop insights about elements of those remedies.

The concept of a "false" statement (a requirement of a false oath, perjury, and bankruptcy crimes) is assessed from the perspective of linguistics. It is argued that upon commencing a bankruptcy case, the debtor begins a communicative process with the bankruptcy court, creditors, and the trustee. This process occurs initially through the verified bankruptcy schedules that the debtor files. This communicative process is fundamentally a conversational exchange in which the debtor conveys meaning through the use of conversational implicature. This bankruptcy discourse, like other talk exchanges, operates in accordance with linguistic principles. Therefore, linguistic principles may be applied in the bankruptcy context to determine whether the debtor makes a false statement when filing a fictitious exemption declaration.

Keywords: Linguistic analysis, Exemption by Declaration, Bankruptcy, False claims, False statements, Perjury, Conversational exchange, Conversational implicature, Communication

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K23, K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Ferguson, Kenneth Decourcy, Discourse and Discharge: Linguistic Analysis and Abuse of the 'Exemption by Declaration' Process in Bankruptcy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 70, p. 55, 1996, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1296012

Kenneth Decourcy Ferguson (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )

5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
Abstract Views
780
Rank
469,563
PlumX Metrics