Indecisiveness in Behavioral Welfare Economics
37 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2008 Last revised: 1 Jul 2013
Date Written: July 1, 2013
Abstract
When an individual's preferences depend on the time or 'frame' at which decisions are made, the preferences that appear at different frames must be aggregated in order to make social decisions. Suppose we aggregate each individual i's frame-based preferences with a 'behavioral welfare relation' that ranks x above y if, when both x and y are available, i sometimes choose x and not y and never chooses y and not x. The set of Pareto optima can then be large. In fact a small amount of preference diversity across frames can cause every allocation to be Pareto optimal. More generally, the set of Pareto optima will have the same dimension as the set of allocations. The Pareto criterion then will not be able to discriminate locally among policy options. A small distortion, for example, will call for no policy response.
Keywords: behavioral welfare economics, incomplete preferences, Pareto optimality
JEL Classification: D11, D60, C60
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
0 References
0 Citations
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Toward Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics
-
Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics
-
By Yuval Salant and Ariel Rubinstein
-
Choice, Rationality and Welfare Measurement
By Jerry Green and Daniel Hojman
-
On the Potential of Neuroeconomics: A Critical (But Hopeful) Appraisal
-
A Million Answers to Twenty Questions: Choosing by Checklist
By Michael Mandler, Paola Manzini, ...
-
A Million Answers to Twenty Questions: Choosing by Checklist
By Michael Mandler, Paola Manzini, ...