Mandates and the Affordability of Health Care
29 Pages Posted: 15 Jan 2009 Last revised: 30 Sep 2022
Date Written: December 2008
Abstract
This paper examines the economic rationale of affordability exemptions in the context of a health insurance mandate. On its face, an affordability exemption makes little sense-- it exempts people from purchasing a good that policymakers believe benefits them. I provide an economic definition of affordability and discuss how it is implemented in the contexts of food, housing, and health care. Affordability standards are frequently used in food and housing policy making, but both empirically and theoretically health care operates quite differently than do these other merit goods. These differences help explain why the use of affordability in health policymaking is so different from its use in these other contexts. I conclude with a discussion of the relationship between mandates and exemptions in other health care systems.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Hmos and Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from Medicare
-
By Tom Getzen
-
The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from the Introduction of Medicare
-
What Did Medicare Do (and Was it Worth it)?
By Amy Finkelstein and Robin Mcknight
-
Managed Care and Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from Medicare
-
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization
By Mark Duggan and Fiona M. Scott Morton
-
Does Contracting Out Increase the Efficiency of Government Programs? Evidence from Medicaid Hmos
By Mark Duggan
-
Do Investors Forecast Fat Firms? Evidence from the Gold Mining Industry
By Severin Borenstein and Joseph Farrell
-
Hospitals, Managed Care, and the Charity Caseload in California
By Janet Currie and John Fahr