Certainty, Efficiency, and Realism: Rights in Collateral under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 73, p. 115, 1994

70 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2009

Date Written: November 1, 1994

Abstract

Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code requires that the debtor have "rights in the collateral" for the attachment of a security interest. The drafters, however, left the determination of the phrase's meaning to the courts. This article argues that the requirement of "rights in the collateral" is unnecessary as it relates to tangible goods and should be deleted from Article 9. As an alternative to the uncertainty engendered by the phrase, the article proposes substituting a set of notice and priority rules that more clearly define the rights and obligations of the parties undertaking an Article 9 transaction involving tangible goods. It concludes by observing that Karl Llewellyn's philosophy of Legal Realism would best be served by such an amendment.

Keywords: Article 9, Secured Transactions, Attachment, Rights in Collateral

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Livingston, Margit, Certainty, Efficiency, and Realism: Rights in Collateral under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (November 1, 1994). North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 73, p. 115, 1994, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1337199

Margit Livingston (Contact Author)

DePaul University College of Law ( email )

25 East Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-2287
United States
3123628701 (Phone)
3123625448 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
133
Abstract Views
1,887
Rank
387,988
PlumX Metrics