Information Acquisition in the Era of Fair Disclosure: An Application of Asymmetric Awareness

37 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2009 Last revised: 26 Feb 2016

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: Feburary 16, 2016

Abstract

As the cost of financial information dissemination continues to decline, investors, firms, and regulators are gradually adopting the principle of fair disclosure, which requires no preferential public disclosure. We use a simple model to examine the impact of this change on information acquisition with two alternative assumptions: (1) Investors have symmetric awareness about the underlying uncertainties, and (2) this awareness is asymmetric among them. Under the first assumption, the change reduces information asymmetry among investors and induces acquisition of high-quality information. Under the second assumption, however, the reduction of information asymmetry may be limited, and information acquisition is less efficient. Specifically, investors with high awareness may either acquire high-quality information at a higher cost or not acquire it; investors with low awareness only acquire low-quality information. The loss in overall information quality is greater when awareness asymmetry is moderate than when it is high or low; this causes information asymmetry between the insiders and outside investors as a whole. These results offer explanations for intriguing empirical findings regarding the effect of a recent accounting regulation (Regulation Fair Disclosure).

Keywords: Regulation Fair Disclosure, Information Disclosure, Fair Disclosure, Conference Call, Selective Disclosure, Unawareness, Asymmetric Awareness

JEL Classification: D61, G14, G38, K22, L51, D8, M4

Suggested Citation

Liu, Zhen, Information Acquisition in the Era of Fair Disclosure: An Application of Asymmetric Awareness (Feburary 16, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1358637 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358637

Zhen Liu (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

Amherst, NY

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
194
Abstract Views
2,664
Rank
124,811
PlumX Metrics