The Psychological Attraction Approach to Accounting and Disclosure Policy
28 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2009
Date Written: March 15, 2009
Abstract
We offer here the psychological attraction approach to accounting and disclosure rules, regulation, and policy as a program for positive accounting research. We suggest that psychological forces have shaped and continue to shape rules and policies in two different ways. (1) Good Rules for Bad Users: rules and policies that provide information in a form that is useful for users who are subject to bias and cognitive processing constraints. (2) Bad Rules: superfluous or even pernicious rules and policies that result from psychological bias on the part of the 'designers' (managers, users, auditors, regulators, politicians, or voters). We offer some initial ideas about psychological sources of the use of historical costs, conservatism, aggregation, and a focus on downside outcomes in risk disclosures. We also suggest that psychological forces cause informal shifts in reporting and disclosure regulation and policy, which can exacerbate boom/bust patterns in financial markets.
JEL Classification: G00, G28, G38, H10, K22, M4, M44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings
By Ray Ball, S.p. Kothari, ...
-
The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting
-
Conservatism in Accounting - Part I: Explanations and Implications
-
International Differences in the Timeliness, Conservatism and Classification of Earnings
By Peter F. Pope and Martin Walker
-
By Ray Ball, Ashok Robin, ...
-
Corporate Financial Statements, a Product of the Market and Political Processes
-
Conservatism in Accounting - Part Ii: Evidence and Research Opportunities
-
Earnings Quality in U.K. Private Firms
By Ray Ball and Lakshmanan Shivakumar