The Idealized Electoral College Voting Mechanism and Shareholder Power

43 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2009 Last revised: 23 Sep 2012

See all articles by Edward Dickersin Van Wesep

Edward Dickersin Van Wesep

University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Finance

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 2, 2010

Abstract

Increasing concern over corporate governance has led to calls for more shareholder influence over corporate decisions, but allowing shareholders to vote on more issues, such as executive compensation, may not affect the quality of governance. We should expect instead that, under current rules, shareholder voting will implement the preferences of the majority of large shareholders and management. This is because majority rule offers little incentive for small shareholders to vote. I offer a potential remedy in the form of a new voting rule, the Idealized Electoral College (IEC), modeled on the American electoral college, that significantly increases the expected impact that a given shareholder has on election. The benefit of the mechanism is that it induces greater turnout, but the cost is that it sometimes assigns a winner that is not preferred by a majority of voters. Therefore, for issues on which management and small shareholders are likely to agree, majority rule is a superior mechanism for shareholder voting. For issues on which they are likely to disagree, the IEC is superior.

Keywords: voting, electoral college, corporate governance

JEL Classification: D71, G34, K22

Suggested Citation

Van Wesep, Edward Dickersin, The Idealized Electoral College Voting Mechanism and Shareholder Power (February 2, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1362055 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1362055

Edward Dickersin Van Wesep (Contact Author)

University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Finance ( email )

Campus Box 419
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
1,058
Rank
248,431
PlumX Metrics