Does Anyone Get Stopped at the Gate? An Empirical Assessment of the Daubert Trilogy in the States

27 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2009

See all articles by Eric Helland

Eric Helland

Claremont McKenna College - Robert Day School of Economics and Finance; RAND

Jonathan Klick

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School; Erasmus School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

Date Written: March 20, 2009

Abstract

The Supreme Court's trilogy of evidence cases, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire appear to mark a significant departure in the way scientific and expert evidence is handled in federal court. By focusing on the underlying methods used to generate the experts' conclusions, Daubert has the potential to impose a more rigorous standard on experts. Given this potential, some individuals have called for states to adopt the Daubert standards to purge "junk science" from state courts. However, there is relatively little empirical support for the notion that Daubert affects the quality of expert evidence. Using a large dataset of state court litigation, we examine whether state adoption of the Daubert standards has a systematic effect on the observable characteristics of experts retained in civil cases. We find very little evidence in support of a significant Daubert effect. This is true even when we do a more detailed analysis of experts in products liability cases, an area of particular concern in the expert evidence debate. These results suggest that, at the state level at least, adoption of the Daubert standards has not led to increasing rigor in expert testimony.

Keywords: Scientific and expert evidence, federal courts, state courts, standards of admissibility, quality of expert testimony, products liability, judges

JEL Classification: C25, K13, K41

Suggested Citation

Helland, Eric A. and Klick, Jonathan, Does Anyone Get Stopped at the Gate? An Empirical Assessment of the Daubert Trilogy in the States (March 20, 2009). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 09-12, Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Research Paper No. 2009-06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1370518 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1370518

Eric A. Helland

Claremont McKenna College - Robert Day School of Economics and Finance ( email )

500 E. Ninth St.
Claremont, CA 91711-6420
United States
909-607-7275 (Phone)
909-621-8243 (Fax)

RAND ( email )

1776 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA
United States

Jonathan Klick (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
2157463455 (Phone)

Erasmus School of Law ( email )

3000 DR Rotterdam
Netherlands

PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
251
Abstract Views
2,451
Rank
220,643
PlumX Metrics