Income Inequality and Poverty
14 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 1998 Last revised: 3 Jul 2022
Date Written: October 1998
Abstract
The first part of this paper argues that income inequality is not a problem in need of remedy. The common practice of interpreting a rise in the gini coefficient measure of inequality as a bad thing violates the Pareto principle and is equivalent to using a social welfare function that puts negative weight on increases in the income of high income individuals. The real distributional problem is not inequality but poverty. The paper considers three sources of poverty and asks what if anything might be done about each of them: unemployment; a low level of earning capacity; and individual choice.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Comparison Utility in a Growth Model
By Christopher D. Carroll, Jody R. Overland, ...
-
Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
By Bruno S. Frey, Simon Luechinger, ...
-
Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
By Alois Stutzer, Simon Luechinger, ...
-
Optimal Taxation When Consumers Have Endogenous Benchmark Levels of Consumption
-
Frustrated Achievers: Winners, Losers, and Subjective Well Being in New Market Economies
By Carol Graham and Stefano Pettinato
-
Optimal Taxation When Consumers Have Benchmark Levels of Consumption