High-Stakes Antitrust
176 Pages Posted: 26 May 2009
Date Written: August 1, 2003
Abstract
After nearly twenty years of a 'less is more' approach to antitrust, the U.S. Department of Justice under the Clinton administration took action against Microsoft, Visa and Mastercard, and American Airlines. Were the antitrust activities of the later Clinton years an aberration, or do they signal a return to an era in which Washington second-guesses market outcomes rather than simply setting ground rules for competition and allowing markets to respond on their own? In High Stakes Antitrust, noted scholars with divergent opinions examine the impact and validity of the Justice Department’s actions. Some believe that changing technology and market conditions justified the Justice Department’s aggressive stance, while others argue that the Department exceeded its authority. They all agree, however, that the impact of the Clinton administration’s antitrust policies will be felt for quite some time.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Staples-Office Depot and Up-Sp: An Antitrust Tale of Two Proposed Mergers
-
Market Definition in Monopolization Cases: A Paradigm is Missing
-
By Philip B Nelson and Lawrence J. White
-
Antitrust Policy During the Clinton Administration
By Carl Shapiro and Robert E. Litan
-
"Market Definition in Monopoly Cases: A Paradigm is Missing,"
-
Has the Consumer Harm Standard Lost its Teeth?
By Howard H. Chang, David S. Evans, ...
-
Horizontal Merger Antitrust Enforcement: Some Historical Perspectives, Some Current Observations
-
Horizontal Merger Antitrust Enforcement: Some Historical Perspectives, Some Current Observations
-
Market Definition and Market Power in Payment Card Networks: Some Comments and Considerations