Constitutional Judicial Review and Political Insurance

28 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2009

See all articles by George Tridimas

George Tridimas

University of Ulster - School of Economics

Date Written: June 15, 2009

Abstract

Considering constitutional judicial review of policy, the power of courts to annul legislation, as a political insurance mechanism to protect against losses from adverse election outcomes, the paper analyzes three questions: First, under what circumstances a political ruler, who wins an election and the right to propose measures of policy, subjects those measures to the checking powers of an independent judiciary. Second, the net expected gains of a political ruler from granting binary choice to the reviewing judiciary rather than open choice. Third, the equilibrium degree of policy review power granted to the judiciary. Differences in the policy preferences of competing politicians, the judiciary and the status quo, the probability of winning an election and the probability that the judiciary confirms legislation passed by the incumbent emerge as the main determinants of judicial review and its political independence.

Keywords: D72, D74, D78, K40, K41

JEL Classification: judicial dispute resolution, constitutional judicial review, judicial independence, political insura

Suggested Citation

Tridimas, George, Constitutional Judicial Review and Political Insurance (June 15, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1419912 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419912

George Tridimas (Contact Author)

University of Ulster - School of Economics ( email )

Shore Road
Newtownabbey
Co Antrim, Northern Ireland BT37 0QB BT37 0QB
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
967
Rank
451,552
PlumX Metrics