Analysis of Tort Damages: A Survey

Posted: 13 Jan 1999

See all articles by Jennifer Arlen

Jennifer Arlen

New York University School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Abstract

Tort liability rules cannot be efficient unless damage rules are efficient. Designing optimal damage awards is remarkably difficult, however. Contrary to conventional wisdom, optimal damage awards do not necessarily fully compensate victims for their losses. Moreover, the issue of what is full compensation is more complex than it might at first appear. This article surveys the literature on tort damages, including damages for serious physical injury and death. Section II discusses the efficiency criteria. Section III presents the basic analysis of tort damages for injuries to replaceable commodities, focusing on the relationship between liability rules and optimal damage rules. Section IV discusses damages for physical injury and death, examining, among other issues, the deterrence and insurance values of life. Section V examines special topics, such as optimal liability when corporations are defendants, whether recovery should depend on defendants' wealth, economic and nonpecuniary losses, and the calculation of damages. An exhaustive bibliography is attached at the end.

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Arlen, Jennifer, Analysis of Tort Damages: A Survey. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=146076

Jennifer Arlen (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://its.law.nyu.edu/facultyprofiles/profile.cfm?personID=20658

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,325
PlumX Metrics