Love Thy Neighbor: Should Religious Accommodations that Negatively Affect Coworkers’ Shift Preferences Constitute an Undue Hardship on the Employer Under Title VII?

118 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2009 Last revised: 23 Sep 2009

Date Written: September 13, 2009

Abstract

In applying Title VII, courts are often confronted with religious accommodations that would negatively affect other employees and are asked to decide whether such an accommodation amounts to an undue hardship on the employer. This Note explores the conflict among circuit courts concerning the scope of an employer’s duty to accommodate religious employees when doing so would negatively affect coworkers’ scheduling preferences, outside context of a collective bargaining agreement. This conflict turns on whether courts consider any negative impact on coworkers impermissible preferential treatment, or whether they require more severe impact on coworkers' rights be demonstrated. This Note argues that preferential treatment of the religious employee exists only when imposition on coworkers creates an economic burden on the employer or requires coworkers to take on additional, physically hazardous tasks.

Keywords: Title VII, religion, accommodation, Hardison, employment

Suggested Citation

Birnbach, Rachel M., Love Thy Neighbor: Should Religious Accommodations that Negatively Affect Coworkers’ Shift Preferences Constitute an Undue Hardship on the Employer Under Title VII? (September 13, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1472698 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1472698

Rachel M. Birnbach (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
62
Abstract Views
677
Rank
632,837
PlumX Metrics