Computing Alternating Offers and Water Prices in Bilateral River Basin Management

International Game Theory Review, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 257-278, 2008

Posted: 30 Oct 2009

See all articles by Harold Houba

Harold Houba

VU University Amsterdam, Department of Econometrics; VU University Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 2008

Abstract

This contribution addresses the fundamental critique in Dinar et al. [1992, Theory and Decision 32] on the use of game theory in river basin management: People are reluctant to monetary transfers unrelated to water prices and game theoretic solutions impose a computational burden. For the bilateral alternating-offers model, a single optimization program significantly reduces the computational burden. Furthermore, water prices and property rights result from exploiting the Second Welfare Theorem. Both issues are discussed and applied to a bilateral version of the theoretical river basin model in Ambec and Sprumont [2002, Journal of Economic Theory 107]. Directions for future research are provided.

Keywords: Bilateral river basin management, alternating offers, computation, water prices, walrasian equilibrium, second welfare theorem, property rights, non-transferable utility C72, C78, D50, D58

JEL Classification: C72, C78, D50, D58

Suggested Citation

Houba, Harold E. D. and Houba, Harold E. D., Computing Alternating Offers and Water Prices in Bilateral River Basin Management (September 2008). International Game Theory Review, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 257-278, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496147

Harold E. D. Houba (Contact Author)

VU University Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://personal.vu.nl/h.e.d.houba/

VU University Amsterdam, Department of Econometrics ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://personal.vu.nl/h.e.d.houba/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
368
PlumX Metrics