Compulsory Education and Substantive Due Process: Asserting Student Rights to a Safe and Healthy School Facility

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 10, p. 201, 2006

U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-30

36 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2009

See all articles by Rebecca Aviel

Rebecca Aviel

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

This Article asserts that students have a substantive due process right to a public school facility that meets minimum health and safety requirements. Students who cannot afford private school are effectively required by law to spend six to eight hours a day in whatever facilities their state education system provides. Constitutionally protected rights to personal security and bodily integrity are implicated when these facilities directly threaten students’ immediate heath and safety – for example, locked or non-functional bathrooms, unsafe drinking water, or classroom walls covered with asthma-inducing mold. Compulsory education under these conditions violates the substantive limits on state action set by the Due Process Clause.

Suggested Citation

Aviel, Rebecca, Compulsory Education and Substantive Due Process: Asserting Student Rights to a Safe and Healthy School Facility (2006). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 10, p. 201, 2006, U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-30, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1509501 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1509501

Rebecca Aviel (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
598
Rank
510,028
PlumX Metrics