Temporally Asymmetric Constraints on Mental Simulation: Retrospection is More Constrained than Prospection

The Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, pp. 131-149, 2008

18 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2010

See all articles by Joanne Kane

Joanne Kane

Princeton University - Department of Psychology

A. Peter McGraw

University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Marketing

Leaf Van Boven

University of Colorado Boulder

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore whether the peculiarity of contemplating a futuristically fantastical past tense might reflect an important facet of mental simulation in the past versus future tense. In addition to being good science fiction we develop the hypothesis that past tense mental simulation (retrospection) feels different and is more constrained - more subject to “reality checks” - than is future tense mental simulation (prospection). We further hypothesize that temporally asymmetric constraints on retrospection render it as phenomenologically different from prospection (i.e., more effortful and difficult) and lead retrospection to yield predictably different judgmental outcomes from those that follow from prospection.

Suggested Citation

Kane, Joanne and McGraw, A. Peter and Van Boven, Leaf, Temporally Asymmetric Constraints on Mental Simulation: Retrospection is More Constrained than Prospection (2008). The Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, pp. 131-149, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1532598 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1532598

Joanne Kane

Princeton University - Department of Psychology ( email )

Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08540
United States

A. Peter McGraw

University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Marketing ( email )

United States

Leaf Van Boven (Contact Author)

University of Colorado Boulder ( email )

University of Colorado Boulder
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
303.735.5238 (Phone)
303.492.2967 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://psych.colorado.edu/~vanboven/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,786
Rank
324,975
PlumX Metrics