Mortgagees’ Duty of Care in Singapore: Staying the Course

25 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2010

See all articles by Kelry Chit Fai Loi

Kelry Chit Fai Loi

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

Abstract

Whilst mortgagees do not owe mortgagors any general duty of care, they may come under specific duties of care, such as the duty to take reasonable steps to obtain the market price when they exercise their power of sale. This is trite law in Singapore. However, it has recently been suggested that mortgagees ought to owe mortgagors a general duty of care whenever there is no conflict of interest between them. This would effectively impose upon mortgagees a duty of care in deciding whether and when to sell the mortgaged asset. This article supports the status quo on grounds of precedent, principle and policy. The case for a general duty of care is flawed. This article argues that no general duty of care ought to be imposed on mortgagees; in particular, mortgagees should owe mortgagors no duty of care in deciding whether and when to sell.

Suggested Citation

Loi, Kelry Chit Fai, Mortgagees’ Duty of Care in Singapore: Staying the Course. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 567-591, December 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1543665

Kelry Chit Fai Loi (Contact Author)

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )

469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776
Singapore

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
1,112
PlumX Metrics