'Generally Inconvenient': The 1624 Statute of Monopolies as Political Compromise

40 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2010

See all articles by Chris Dent

Chris Dent

Murdoch University - School of Law

Date Written: February, 16 2010

Abstract

The Statute of Monopolies 1624 is central to one of the tests for patentability of inventions in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth). The continued reference to the statute, almost 400 years after it was enacted, accords it an almost idealised status within patent law. Such a status does not acknowledge the political context of its passage through the Jacobean Parliament. This article addresses key aspects of the early modern period - including economic depression, issues of succession, and the rivalry between the City of London and the outports - to argue that the Statute of Monopolies is best seen as a compromise, a political deal done between the Crown, the House of Lords and the individuals and groups within the House of Commons.

Keywords: patent law, Statute of Monopolies

JEL Classification: K00, K19

Suggested Citation

Dent, Chris, 'Generally Inconvenient': The 1624 Statute of Monopolies as Political Compromise (February, 16 2010). Melbourne Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2009, U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 452, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1554190

Chris Dent (Contact Author)

Murdoch University - School of Law ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
327
Abstract Views
1,967
Rank
168,830
PlumX Metrics