Human Rights and Biomedical Research Funding for the Developing World: Discovering State Obligations Under the Right for Health
Health and Human Rights, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 26-58, 1999
33 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2010
Date Written: 1999
Abstract
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) obligates states to "take steps individually and through international assistance and co-operation ... to the maximum of (their) available resources" to realize the right to health. This obligation, however, is often dismissed because (1) realizing rights through "international assistance" is thought to intrude on state sovereignty and (2) it is impossible to say what is demanded by the "maximum of ... available resources." These problems can be circumvented by "reading down" the mutual assistance clause, so that it demands only that steps be taken on a state's own territory, with its pecuniary resources. Industrialized states could use public funds to reserach diseases such as malaria, AIDS, and tuberculosis, but they have failed to consider their ICESCR obligations in making science funding decisions. These failures point to ubiquitous and grievous violations of international law.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Do Patents for Antiretroviral Drugs Constrain Access to Aids Treatment in Africa?
By Amir Attaran and Lee Gillespie-white
-
Defining and Refining International Donor Support for Combating the AIDS Pandemic
By Jeffrey D. Sachs and Amir Attaran
-
Trading Ideology for Dialogue: An Opportunity to Fix International Aid for Health?
By Ines Perin and Amir Attaran