The Pro-Competitive Effect of Campaign Limits in Non-Majoritarian Elections

California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Paper No. 1319

52 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2010

See all articles by Matias Iaryczower

Matias Iaryczower

Princeton University

Andrea Mattozzi

University of Bologna - Department of Economics

Date Written: March 1, 2010

Abstract

We study a model of elections in non-majoritarian systems that captures the link between competition in policies and competition in campaign spending. We argue that the overall competitiveness of the political arena depends both on the endogenous number of parties contesting the election and the endogenous level of campaign spending. These two dimensions are linked together through their combined effect on the total equilibrium level of political rents. We illustrate the key insights of the model through the analysis of two major electoral institutions: campaign spending limits and compulsory voting. In particular, we show that under some conditions spending caps and compulsory voting can be pro-competitive, leading to an increase in the number of parties contesting the elections.

Keywords: Elections, Proportional Representation, Campaign Finance, Valence, Abstention

JEL Classification: D72, D78, C72

Suggested Citation

Iaryczower, Matias and Mattozzi, Andrea, The Pro-Competitive Effect of Campaign Limits in Non-Majoritarian Elections (March 1, 2010). California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Paper No. 1319, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1562098 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562098

Matias Iaryczower

Princeton University ( email )

Corwin Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544-1012
United States

Andrea Mattozzi (Contact Author)

University of Bologna - Department of Economics ( email )

Bologna
Italy

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
591
Rank
675,336
PlumX Metrics