Tobin's q Does Not Measure Firm Performance: Theory, Empirics, and Alternatives
39 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2010 Last revised: 6 Mar 2015
Date Written: March 5, 2015
Abstract
Tobin's q is often used to proxy for firm performance when studying the relation between corporate governance and firm performance. However, our theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrate that Tobin's q does not measure firm performance since underinvestment increases rather than decreases Tobin's q. As an alternative to Tobin's q, our theoretical framework provides two new operating efficiency measures: the first assesses scale efficiency and the second assesses cost discipline. These proxies are justified by the ideal of maximizing firm value net of invested capital, and can be computed for a wide cross-section of firms. In a canonical governance-performance regression specification, our operating efficiency measures lead to a different conclusion than Tobin's q.
Keywords: Firm Performance, Corporate Governance, Tobin's q, Operating Efficiency
JEL Classification: G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Innovation and Institutional Ownership
By Philippe Aghion, John Van Reenen, ...
-
Innovation and Institutional Ownership
By Philippe Aghion, John Van Reenen, ...
-
Innovation and Institutional Ownership
By Philippe Aghion, John Van Reenen, ...
-
Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D
By Julie Wulf and Josh Lerner
-
Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D
By Julie Wulf and Josh Lerner
-
Tolerance for Failure and Corporate Innovation
By Xuan Tian and Tracy Yue Wang
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Ramin Baghai, ...
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Ramin Baghai, ...