Price Levels and Economic Growth: Making Sense of the PPP Changes between ICP Rounds
29 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: March 1, 2010
Abstract
To the surprise of many observers, the 2005 International Comparison Program (ICP) found substantially higher purchasing power parity (PPP) rates, relative to market exchange rates, in most developing countries. For example, China?s price level index -- the ratio of its PPP to its exchange rate -- doubled between the 1993 and 2005 rounds of the ICP. The paper tries to explain the observed changes in PPPs. Consistently with the Balassa-Samuelson model, evidence is found of a "dynamic Penn effect," whereby more rapidly growing economies experience steeper increases in their price level index. This effect has been even stronger for initially poorer countries. Thus the widely-observed static (cross-sectional) Penn effect has been attenuated over time. On also taking account of exchange rate changes and prior participation in the ICP?s price surveys, 99 percent of the variance in the observed changes in PPPs is explicable. Using a nested test, the World Bank?s longstanding method of extrapolating PPPs between ICP rounds using inflation rates alone is out performed by the model proposed in this paper.
Keywords: Markets and Market Access, Economic Theory & Research, Emerging Markets, E-Business, Debt Markets
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By David Dollar and Aart Kraay
-
Growth Still is Good for the Poor
By David Dollar, Tatjana Kleineberg, ...
-
What Can New Survey Data Tell Us About Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?
By Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen
-
By David Dollar and Aart Kraay
-
How Did the World's Poorest Fare in the 1990s?
By Shaohua Chen and Martin Ravallion
-
Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone