Just Go Away: Representation, Due Process, and Preclusion in Class Actions

50 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2010

Date Written: March 10, 2010

Abstract

A number of commentators have argued for an expansion of the preclusion doctrines in the class action context, thereby limiting the ability to challenge a class judgment through subsequent litigation. The preclusion doctrines apply when one's interests have already been represented and litigated, and thus, as a general matter, the preclusion doctrines do not apply to non-parties; the class action is one of several limited exceptions. In this Article, I conclude that the class action exception is notably and distinctively inconsistent with the underlying construct that gives cohesion to the preclusion doctrines and their exceptions - a construct with both theoretical and practical dimensions: the foundational prerequisite of direct representation in litigation.

Keywords: class actions, preclusion doctrines, res judicata, collateral estoppel, collateral attack, absent class members, due process, federal courts, opt-in, opt-out, representation

Suggested Citation

Bassett, Debra Lyn, Just Go Away: Representation, Due Process, and Preclusion in Class Actions (March 10, 2010). Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 5, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1568320

Debra Lyn Bassett (Contact Author)

Southwestern Law School ( email )

3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
1,172
Rank
407,300
PlumX Metrics