Anxious Scrutiny in the Irish Courts: Too Little, Too Late?

Hibernian Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 75, 2009

18 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2010

See all articles by Paul O'Connell

Paul O'Connell

University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law

Date Written: May 20, 2009

Abstract

This article looks at the approach of the Irish superior courts to challenges to administrative decisions on the basis of “reasonableness”, in particular the courts' historical resistance to adopting “variable standards” of reasonableness review, and more recent developments which may indicate a departure from the position. It begins by briefly setting out the development of variable standards of reasonableness review in the English law; the adoption of reasonableness by the Irish courts and their initial hesitance to adopting variable standards, before then going on to consider more recent cases which appear to evince an openness to this approach. This article also considers whether or not this departure from rigid reasonableness has come too late to make any real difference, given the potential supplanting of reasonableness with proportionality review.

Keywords: administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness review, human rights, proportionality, Ireland

Suggested Citation

O'Connell, Paul, Anxious Scrutiny in the Irish Courts: Too Little, Too Late? (May 20, 2009). Hibernian Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 75, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1568768

Paul O'Connell (Contact Author)

University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law ( email )

London, WC1H 0XG
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
205
Abstract Views
914
Rank
268,682
PlumX Metrics