Payment Cards Pricing Patterns: The Role of Antitrust and Regulatory Authorities
19 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2010
Date Written: March 18, 2010
Abstract
Antitrust enforcers and regulators are increasingly worried that interchange fees in four-party systems, more than being an instrument for addressing usage externality, had become a collusionary device, setting a floor under which the charges could not go. Competition is not working effectively in card payment systems. The reason is that with the non discrimination rule in place, the cost of payment services is transferred by merchants to all buyers, not just to cardholders. As a result, cardholders (that do not pay for the cost of their choice) tend to use the payment instrument that offers the highest private benefits to them (the one with the better reward system), often the most costly. In turn, issuers tend to offer to consumers the cards that provide the highest interchange fee. This paper shows that eliminating the interchange fee and allowing for both issuers and acquirers to charge cardholders and merchants respectively may lead to the internalization of usage externalities and to markets for payment services to operate more effectively. Furthermore the elimination of the no-discrimination rule may also discipline three party systems, as the Australian example shows.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Mergers in Two-Sided Markets: An Application to the Canadian Newspaper Industry
-
Insulated Platform Competition
By Alexander White and E. Glen Weyl
-
Platform Pricing at Sports Card Conventions
By Ginger Zhe Jin and Marc Rysman
-
The First-Order Approach to Merger Analysis
By Sonia Jaffe and E. Glen Weyl
-
By Lapo Filistrucchi, Tobias J. Klein, ...
-
Estimating Platform Market Power in Two-Sided Markets with an Application to Magazine Advertising
By Minjae Song
-
Merger Simulation in a Two-Sided Market: The Case of the Dutch Daily Newspapers
By Lapo Filistrucchi, Tobias J. Klein, ...
-
By David S. Evans and Michael D. Noel
-
By David S. Evans and Michael D. Noel