Wars, Presidents, and Popularity: The Political Cost(s) of War Re-Examined

Posted: 4 Jun 2010

See all articles by Benny Geys

Benny Geys

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: Summer 2010

Abstract

Extensive research demonstrates that war casualties depress incumbent popularity. The present study argues that one should also account for financial costs of wars, since a) such costs are substantial; b) such costs are publicly observed and understood; and c) fiscal policy affects incumbents’ approval ratings. Empirical evidence using U.S. data for the period between 1948 and 2008 supports this theoretical claim: pecuniary costs of warfare either directly affect presidential popularity (e.g., in the Korean War) or their inclusion affects the predicted political cost of war casualties (e.g., in the Korean and Iraq/Afghanistan wars). Interestingly, the adverse effect of war spending is strongest under favorable economic conditions (i.e., low unemployment).

Suggested Citation

Geys, Benny, Wars, Presidents, and Popularity: The Political Cost(s) of War Re-Examined (Summer 2010). Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 74, Issue 2, pp. 357-374, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1617121 or http://dx.doi.org/nfq001

Benny Geys (Contact Author)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) ( email )

Pleinlaan 2
http://www.vub.ac.be/
Brussels, 1050
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
441
PlumX Metrics