Increasing Web Survey Response Rates in Innovation Research: An Experimental Study of Static and Dynamic Contact Design Features
33 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2010 Last revised: 29 Oct 2015
Date Written: April 30, 2012
Abstract
Web surveys have become increasingly central to innovation research but often suffer from low response rates. Based on a cost-benefits framework and the explicit consideration of heterogeneity across respondents, we consider the effects of key contact design features such as personalization, incentives, and the exact timing of survey contacts on web survey response rates. We also consider the benefits of a “dynamic strategy”, i.e., the approach to change features of survey contacts over the survey life cycle. We explore these effects experimentally using a career survey sent to over 24,000 junior scientists and engineers. The results show that personalization increases the odds of responding by as much as 48%, while lottery incentives with a high payoff and a low chance of winning increase the odds of responding by 30%. Furthermore, changing the wording of reminders over the survey life cycle increases the odds of a response by over 30%, while changes in contact timing (day of the week or hour of the day) did not have significant benefits. Improvements in response rates did not come at the expense of lower data quality. Our results provide novel insights into web survey response behavior and suggest useful tools for innovation researchers seeking to increase survey participation.
Keywords: web surveys, response rates, experimental method, scientists, dynamic strategy, incentives, personalization, timing
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation
By Henry Sauermann and Wesley M. Cohen
-
What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation
By Henry Sauermann and Wesley M. Cohen
-
By Michael Roach and Henry Sauermann
-
Schumpeter's Prophecy and Individual Incentives as a Driver of Innovation
By Wesley M. Cohen and Henry Sauermann
-
Not All Scientists Pay to Be Scientists: PhDs’ Preferences for Publishing in Industrial Employment
By Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach
-
Twins or Strangers? Differences and Similarities between Industrial and Academic Science
By Henry Sauermann and Paula E. Stephan
-
By Joshua S. Gans, Fiona Murray, ...
-
Individual Preferences, Organization, and Competition in a Model of R&D Incentive Provision
By Nicola Lacetera and Lorenzo Zirulia
-
Politics and Funding in the U.S. Public Biomedical R&D System
By Deepak Hegde and David C. Mowery