The ‘Culture of Honor’ in Citizens' Concepts of Their Duty

30 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2010

See all articles by Jonathan Baron

Jonathan Baron

University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology

Date Written: June 18, 2010

Abstract

Web studies explored citizens' concepts of their duty and their choices concerning actual policies. Some people see a moral duty to support their group (their nation) regardless of harmful effects on outsiders. One study supports the hypothesis that this duty avoids betrayal of the nation, which they see as granting the right to vote for the purpose of advancing national interest. Some also see a duty to defend their self-interest through voting; many think this is a rational way to pursue their interests. Another justification is, “If [the voter] does not look out for her own interests, nobody else will.” I hypothesize a norm of responsibility for self-defense, the “culture of honor'” (Cohen & Nisbett, 1994) in all of us. Yet politics is by design an inefficient way to pursue self-interest, although it is efficient for advancing the good of all.

Keywords: voting, self-interest, moral judgment, duty, parochialism

Suggested Citation

Baron, Jonathan, The ‘Culture of Honor’ in Citizens' Concepts of Their Duty (June 18, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1626932 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1626932

Jonathan Baron (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology ( email )

3815 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6196
United States
215-898-6918 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
821
Rank
555,601
PlumX Metrics