Nomadism, Dependency, Slavery and Nationhood: Comparative Politics in the Book of Exodus

16 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2010 Last revised: 24 Aug 2011

Date Written: August 11, 2010

Abstract

This paper continues the analysis of the Hebrew Bible as a work of political theory. Previous papers have presented the Garden of Eden story as a prolegomenon outlining concepts of legitimate authority; the stories of the Dark Age and the Flood as a justification for the role of government and law in facilitating human flourishing; and the accounts of the Patriarchs as an exploration of patriarchy as a form of social organization. The present paper examines the first fifteen chapters of the book of Exodus. In Exodus, the author moves to the topic of political authority – the exercise of power over people not connected by close family ties. The author demonstrates that political authority is the only feasible way to govern populations that have grown to any substantial size. He compares and contrasts four types of political organization, each of which was well known in the ancient Near East: nomadism, dependency, slavery, and nationhood. The author demonstrates that nationhood is strictly superior to the alternatives as a means for structuring political power.

Suggested Citation

Miller, Geoffrey P., Nomadism, Dependency, Slavery and Nationhood: Comparative Politics in the Book of Exodus (August 11, 2010). NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-49, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1656999 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656999

Geoffrey P. Miller (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

Center for the Study of Central Banks
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6329 (Phone)
212-995-4590 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
1,230
Rank
404,654
PlumX Metrics