A Meta-Analysis of the Equity Premium

Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 10-078/3

29 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2010 Last revised: 18 Aug 2012

See all articles by Casper Van Ewijk

Casper Van Ewijk

Universiteit van Amsterdam; Netspar

Henri L. F. de Groot

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute

Coos Santing

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: August 23, 2010

Abstract

The equity premium is a key parameter in asset allocation policies. There is a vigorous debate in the literature regarding the actual measurement of the equity premium, its size and the determinants of its variation. This study aims to take stock of this literature by means of a meta-analysis. We identify how the size of the equity premium depends on the way it is measured, along with its evolution over time and its variation across regions in the world. We find that the equity premium is significantly lower if measured by ex ante methods rather than ex post, in more recent periods, and for more developed countries. In addition, looking at the underlying fundamentals, we find that larger volatility in GDP growth tends to raise the equity premium while a higher nominal interest rate has a negative impact on the equity premium.

Keywords: equity premium, meta-analysis

JEL Classification: D53, E44, G12, N20

Suggested Citation

Van Ewijk, Casper and de Groot, Henri L.F. and Santing, Coos, A Meta-Analysis of the Equity Premium (August 23, 2010). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 10-078/3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664942 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1664942

Casper Van Ewijk (Contact Author)

Universiteit van Amsterdam ( email )

Roetersstraat 11
Amsterdam, 1018 WB
Netherlands

Netspar ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Henri L.F. De Groot

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Netherlands
0640494981 (Phone)
2135 DL (Fax)

Tinbergen Institute

Gustav Mahlerplein 17
Amsterdam, 1082 MS
Netherlands

Coos Santing

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
272
Abstract Views
2,203
Rank
206,203
PlumX Metrics