Do Merger Guidelines Revise or Describe Policy: The Case of the 1997 Efficiency Revision
34 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2010 Last revised: 14 Sep 2011
Date Written: September 14, 2011
Abstract
The 1997 Merger Guidelines appeared to significantly expand the role of efficiency considerations in merger analysis. However, it is possible that the revision simply memorialized existing policy and thus served more to improve transparency than reform policy. By combining an existing review of Federal Trade Commission merger studies after the 1997 reform, with a new review of merger studies from the five years prior to the revision, it is possible to shed some light on this question. In general, the FTC efficiency analyses did not change after the reform, and the bulk of the considerations noted in the Guidelines appear in the files over the entire sample period. Only the study of merger specific efficiencies seemed to clearly change in 1997, as the revised Guidelines mandated that alternative methods to achieve the efficiency must be practical given the market considerations. Overall, the impact of efficiencies on the merger challenge decision appeared to date to the arrival of Chairman Pitofsky at the FTC. Interestingly, this change also supported giving consideration to fixed cost savings, but seemed to insist on some evidence of pass-through to consumers for the fixed cost claims to “count.” Finally, the evidence suggests that findings of efficiencies are not always more likely to occur in closed investigations, further suggesting efficiency claims may affect the merger challenge decision in a “close call.”
Keywords: Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Efficiencies, Fixed Costs
JEL Classification: K21, L40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Daubert, Science, and Modern Game Theory: Implications for Merger Analysis
-
Unilateral Effects Under the Guidelines: Models, Merits, and Merger Policy
-
Upward Pressure on Price (UPP) Analysis: Issues and Implications For Merger Policy
By Joseph J. Simons and Malcolm B. Coate
-
By Gregory K. Leonard and Lawrence Wu
-
The Enhanced Upward Pressure on Price Screen: Merging Markets into the UPP Methodology
-
Continuity and Change in the 2010 Merger Guidelines
By Malcolm B. Coate and Joseph J. Simons
-
Why Can’t We All Just Get Along: Structural Modeling and Natural Experiments in Merger Analysis