Asset Allocation and Managerial Assumptions in Corporate Pension Plans
60 Pages Posted: 18 Nov 2010
Date Written: November 16, 2010
Abstract
We empirically examine the effect of regulations on pension decision-making. We find that in the face of mandatory contributions, pension plans alter their asset allocations and increase their risk taking to avoid mandatory contributions. This behavior resembles gambling for resurrection. The economic effects we document are large, representing annual active reallocations of over $103M for the average plan. We also examine the effect of regulations on pension accounting assumptions affecting net income. We find that plan sponsors increase their assumed rates of return on plan assets when subject to pension-related costs. The evidence suggests an earnings-management interpretation. Finally, we examine whether pension fund managers are tactical in their asset allocations. We find that pension fund managers are active as an investor class, but do not seem to time the market in a manner consistent with return predictability.
Keywords: Asset Allocation, Managerial Assumptions, Pensions, Regulations
JEL Classification: G00, G11, G23, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Investment and Financing Constraints: Evidence from the Funding of Corporate Pension Plans
-
Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy
By Irwin Tepper
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions: Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Funding and Asset Allocation in Corporate Pension Plans: an Empirical Investigation
By Zvi Bodie, Randall Morck, ...
-
Did Pension Plan Accounting Contribute to a Stock Market Bubble?