Cost-Effectiveness of Buprenorphine and Naltrexone Treatments for Heroin Dependence in Malaysia
Ruger JP, Chawarski M, Mazlan M, Ng N, Schottenfeld R. Cost-Effectiveness of Buprenorphine and Naltrexone Treatments for Heroin Dependence in Malaysia. PloS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50673.
10 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2010 Last revised: 14 Oct 2014
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
Aims: To aid public health policymaking, we studied the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and placebo interventions for heroin dependence in Malaysia.
Design: We estimated the cost-effectiveness ratios of three treatments for heroin dependence. We used a microcosting methodology to determine fixed, variable, and societal costs of each intervention. Cost data were collected from investigators, staff, and project records on the number and type of resources used and unit costs; societal costs for participants’ time were estimated using Malaysia’s minimum wage. Costs were estimated from a provider and societal perspective and reported in 2004 US dollars.
Setting: Muar, Malaysia.
Participants: 126 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in Malaysia (2003–2005) receiving counseling and buprenorphine, naltrexone, or placebo for treatment of heroin dependence.
Measurements: Primary outcome measures included days in treatment, maximum consecutive days of heroin abstinence, days to first heroin use, and days to heroin relapse. Secondary outcome measures included treatment retention, injection drug use, illicit opiate use, AIDS Risk Inventory total score, and drug risk and sex risk subscores.
Findings: Buprenorphine was more effective and more costly than naltrexone for all primary and most secondary outcomes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were below $50 for primary outcomes, mostly below $350 for secondary outcomes. Naltrexone was dominated by placebo for all secondary outcomes at almost all endpoints. Incremental treatment costs were driven mainly by medication costs, especially the price of buprenorphine.
Conclusions: Buprenorphine appears to be a cost-effective alternative to naltrexone that might enhance economic productivity and reduce drug use over a longer term.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness, buprenorphine, naltrexone, heroin dependence, Malaysia
JEL Classification: I18, I10, I12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Jennifer Prah Ruger, Arbi Ben Abdallah, ...
-
By Jennifer Prah Ruger, Karen M. Emmons, ...
-
By Jennifer Prah Ruger, Arbi Ben Abdallah, ...
-
Costs of Addressing Heroin Addiction in Malaysia and 32 Comparable Countries Worldwide
By Jennifer Prah Ruger, Marek Chawarski, ...
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent HIV and STDs Among Women: A Randomized Control Trial
By Jennifer Prah Ruger, Arbi Ben Abdallah, ...